Crime @ RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

e-Voice Of Human Rights Watch
e-Voice Of Human Rights Watch

e – Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom

 

Editor: Nagaraj.M.R….vol.4 . issue.38……20/09/2008

 

<a href=”http://www.amnesty.org“><img border=”0″ alt=”Support Amnesty
International” title=”Support Amnesty International”
src=”
http://www.amnesty.org/images/banners/banner2-red/banner2-468×60-eng.jpg“/>\
</a>

 

 
 
Editorial : CRIMES OF RBI & CBI & IT'S COVER-UP
- An appeal to honourable supreme court of India
 
The central bank of India  Reserve Bank Of India , which is supposed to direct the fiscal policies of government of India , has failed to do so. It has enabled many looters in the garb of entrepreneurs  , to swindle the exchequer to the tune of crores of rupees. The premiere
investigating agency of India CBI has failed to nail the culprits.
 
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of India to treat this as a PIL application & to provide speedy justice in following cases. Jai hind, Vande mataram.
 
Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.
 
Read the article "PF scam shame shame judges" @
http://corruptmajority.blogspot.com/ ,
http://corruptjudges.rediffblogs.com/
 
 
SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE
-       Trauma of an old man
 
Complete case details also available at http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/ 
 
As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal
nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the
banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled
currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after
collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes
which can be reissued & burns off the remaining totally defaced
currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.
 
As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the
period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away
the currency bundles meant for destruction & substituted it in the
place of bundles of reissuables.
 
Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram 
Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985
Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985
 
CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,
case olde no. cc34/1989       new no.  sc 436/1991            . the honourable 21 city additional city civil & sessions court Bangalore in it's order dated 24.01.1992 
   discharged        03  charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution
failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as
they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the
charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has
given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the
involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.
 
Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into
service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry & showed
contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of
Karnataka ordered RBI to review it's order with respect to
mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service
, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.
 
In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all
, orders of court over rides the organisation's internal rules ,
service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical
manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the
scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had
personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI  repeatedly showed contempt to the
court orders , dismissed the scape goat - ailing old man mr.G.Hariram
from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss
to the bank , didn't pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and
finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man
has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot
& he is a mental wreck today.
 
Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /
scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn't conduct polygraph tests
of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers
of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the
crimes master minded by higher ups & didn't co-operate with the higher
ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape
goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating
innocents themselves as criminals.
 
Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram & who
will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?
 
 
PUBLIC CROSS EXAMINATION OF  HONOURABLE GOVERNOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO  old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991   AT 21 ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE 
 
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
 
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
 
Amended charge sheet  staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
 
 
 
1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of  1979 ?
 
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?
 
3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?
 
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
 
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
 
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?
 
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
 
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?
 
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
 
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?
 
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead  of
independent investigation ?
 
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
 
13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?
 
14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it  didn't , why ?
 
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
 
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?
 
17. RBI authorities have stated  that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However  RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
 
18. The alleged crime  was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
 
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
 
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
 
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
 
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
 
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?
 
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
 
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why  RBI has denied his
pension ?
 
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
 
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
 
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI  completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
 
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
 
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
 
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
 
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
 
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
 
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?
 
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
 
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled verified defective note packets ?
 
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers illegal ?
 
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went missing ?
 
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
 
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from packets made into new bundles , right ?
 
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
 
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
 
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?
 
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
 
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
 
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 & 1979 ?
 
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court proceedings ?
 
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is not 100% sure ?
 
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
 
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud. However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been taken ?
 
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?
 
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
 
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
 
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
 
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original criminals ?
 
56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?
 
57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?
 
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal prosecution ?
 
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
 
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn't it ?
 
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
 
 
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
 
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted , dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
 
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?
 
65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
 
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
 
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off why ?
 
68.        the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
 
 
 

69.         as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work practices ?

 

70.         does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original criminals ?

 

questions with respect to other cases

 

71.         how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

 

72.         how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have invested ?

 

73.         how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?

 

74.         inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans become NPAs  & full value  cann’t be realized in the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than permissible ?

 

75.         give bankwise  specific figures of NPAs.

 

76.         give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them  , before investing in new companies promoted by them.

 

 

77.         is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

 

78.         why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

 

79.         if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?

 

80.         what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

 

81.         what action has been taken against those involved ?

 

82.         have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful & bigwigs ?

 

83.         how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

 

84.         how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign donations by many NGOs ?

 

85.         how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?

 

questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE

 

86.  who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?


87.  who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what criminal roles ?


88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?


89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the security set-up in R.B.I ?


90.  how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?


91.  how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are accounted for?


92.  How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?


93.  Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all the above?


94.  How the scrap paper is disposed off ?


95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?

 

96.        Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

 

97.        give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

 

98.        give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?

 

99.        is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?

 

100.   still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of cubboard ?

 

101.   what action initiated against the SBI  branch Bangalore  & SBI Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not why ?

 

102.   give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?

 

103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs  causing huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?

 

FINANCE SCAMS IN INDIA & 5-STAR LEADERS WITH BEGGING BOWL

In ” mysooru mithra” a kannada daily dated 15/06/2005, the editor has written about a copy of the complaint made by Transparency International India-Bangalore to central vigilance commission of india.


In indian banks , there is a strange practice that whenever a cheque is put before the clearing house by a bank, the clearing house sends that cheque to the service branch of bank paying. The service branch then sends that cheque to the appropriate bank branch
for deduction of cash from the cheque account. In this travel , if the cheque is lost or misplaced midway, the service branch pays out of it’s suspense account to the cash collecting bank. Logically, afterwards the service branch must initiate a thorough inquiry, get authentication from both persons one who gave cheque & other who collected cheque. Finally, the money must be transferred from the account of cheque giver to the suspense account.


However , upto 1997 two branches of state bank of india in bangalore & overseas branch sufferred from frequent loss of cheques totally amounting to RUPEES THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED CRORE. In all cases of cheque loss the bank has paid out of suspense account, totally amounting to Rs.3200 crore. However the bank has not
initiated any enquiry to recover that amount from the cheque givers.


In the 1997 internal audit report of the bank itself , this has been clearly pointed out. Till date, even the central vigilance commission has not initiated any action about it. A member of central vigilance commission happens to be ex-chairman of state bank of india.


It is just an instance of two branches of SBI, what about hundreds of branches of SBI, what about thousands of branches of other public sector,private sector & co-operative banks. It is fraud,fraud,fraud all the way. Few months back to cover-up the crimes
of global trust bank ( GTB) , it was taken over by oriental bank of commerce ( OBC).
While sanctioning a loan of just Rs.10000 to a common man , he has to comply with lengthy legalities. If he defaults, bankers breath down his neck, bankers send rowdies in the form of recovery agents to humiliate the common man & his properties are
auctioned-off, finally all dues to the last penny are recovered. In most of the cases bankers even force the defaulters to commit suicide. However influential persons easily gets loans amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees, coolly defaults, siphons-off the funds & shuts his shop. No recovery at all , just it becomes a non- performing asset (NPA) in the bank ledger. The total NPAs of all public sector banks is more than Rs.80000 crore. This burden is spead over the crores of hapless indians.


The government takes pride in murdering forest brigand veerappan. The ill-gotten wealth of veerappan is not even pea nuts before this huge amount. Remember past finance scams – MS SHOES, HAWALA, HARSHAD MEHTA SHARE SCAM, KETAN PAREKH SHARE SCAM, UTI, etc. totally in all these scams billions of dollars of public money have gone to the coffers of criminals. These scamsters put veerappan to shame in their turnover. However the government is not even exhibiting a fraction of it’s ELIMINATE VEERAPPAN DRIVE against these scamsters, why?


In india, both central & state government tax/ revenue officials are neck deep in corruption. By, taking bribe they make lower assessment of income, gains, etc & spare businessmen from the tax payment. The government in return for favours received from
lobbies, gives tax exemptions to them at it’s sweet will. All these scams & it’s cover-ups are insider jobs. The government is not interested to collect, recover it’s own monies
amounting to billions of billions of dollars every year. However our 5-star leaders living at the expense of tax-payers, go-on foreign jaunts with a begging bowl for a few lakhs of dollars. What a shame?


More than 50 billion indians are barely surviving on a single meal per day & hundreds are dying due to starvation, billions don’t even have basic necessities of life. If the government even just collects a fraction of it’s dues from scamsters, defaulting industrialists – people won’t die of hunger in india. Has this enlightened our thick skinned netas ?

 

AN APPEAL TO Mr.P.CHIDAMBARAM UNION FINANCE MINISTER GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA

An age old saying – AS THE KING SO DOES THE SUBJECTS. In india various financial scams, crimes & it’s cover-ups have taken place amounting to billions of billions of dollars have taken place, made possible , just due to the involvement of the king – the netas & government officials themselves in the shameful act – the crime.


The tax officials are utterly corrupt, the wards of these officials spend double their pappa’s salary just during
weekends. Now, realise their financial might. These ill-gotten wealth is destabilising our economy & might have even found it’s way into the hands of underworld, terorrists. INDIA WILL BE DEFEATED FROM
CRIMINAL FORCES WITHIN LIKE THIS NOT FROM THE EXTERNAL FORCES.


Hereby, the HRW urges you to make public:


1. the financial worth of finance minister to tax official at circle level, on annual basis including his spouse’s worth & property details.


2. to make public the NPAs, losses & monies under litigation by both private & public sector banks annually.


3. to make public measures taken to recover these monies.


4. to publish annual accounts with complete details of discretionary funds allotted to the defence ministry, president, prime minister, chief ministers , governors & intelligence agencies.


Public want to know whether proper discretion is being applied while spending.

 <script type=”text/javascript”>
var irr_lang = ‘en’;
</script>
<script src=”
http://fragments.irrepressible.info/js/fragment-125.js
type=”text/javascript”>

</script>

 

 

 

 

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE –  570017 INDIA …       cell :09341820313
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ ,
http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ , http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ ,  http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
contact :
naghrw@yahoo.com  ,  nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA

 

 

 

Advertisements

Crimes @RBI


st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Wingdings; panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-charset:2; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 268435456 0 0 -2147483648 0;} @font-face {font-family:Latha; panose-1:2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:1048579 0 0 0 1 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:””; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} pre {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; tab-stops:45.8pt 91.6pt 137.4pt 183.2pt 229.0pt 274.8pt 320.6pt 366.4pt 412.2pt 458.0pt 503.8pt 549.6pt 595.4pt 641.2pt 687.0pt 732.8pt; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Courier New”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:.5in .5in .5in .5in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} /* List Definitions */ @list l0 {mso-list-id:780345739; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:1795864126 139232350 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;} @list l0:level1 {mso-level-start-at:68; mso-level-tab-stop:48.0pt; mso-level-number-position:left; margin-left:48.0pt; text-indent:-30.0pt;} @list l1 {mso-list-id:1095638003; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:486845662 1633303210 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693 67698689 67698691 67698693;} @list l1:level1 {mso-level-start-at:70; mso-level-number-format:bullet; mso-level-text:-; mso-level-tab-stop:.5in; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-.25in; font-family:”Courier New”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @list l2 {mso-list-id:1683891617; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:-843913840 234226228 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;} @list l2:level1 {mso-level-start-at:96; mso-level-tab-stop:45.75pt; mso-level-number-position:left; margin-left:45.75pt; text-indent:-27.75pt;} ol {margin-bottom:0in;} ul {margin-bottom:0in;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
e – Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly

Spreading the light of humanity & freedom

Editor: Nagaraj.M.R….vol.4 . issue.38……20/09/2008

 
 
Editorial : CRIMES OF RBI & CBI & IT'S COVER-UP
- An appeal to honourable supreme court of India
 
The central bank of India  Reserve Bank Of India , which is supposed to direct the fiscal policies of government of India , has failed to do so. It has enabled many looters in the garb of entrepreneurs  , to swindle the exchequer to the tune of crores of rupees. The premiere
investigating agency of India CBI has failed to nail the culprits.
 
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of India to treat this as a PIL application & to provide speedy justice in following cases. Jai hind, Vande mataram.
 
Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.
 
Read the article "PF scam shame shame judges" @
http://corruptmajority.blogspot.com/ ,
http://corruptjudges.rediffblogs.com/
 
 
SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE
-       Trauma of an old man
 
Complete case details also available at http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/ 
 
As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal
nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the
banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled
currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after
collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes
which can be reissued & burns off the remaining totally defaced
currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.
 
As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the
period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away
the currency bundles meant for destruction & substituted it in the
place of bundles of reissuables.
 
Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram 
Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985
Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985
 
CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,
case olde no. cc34/1989       new no.  sc 436/1991            . the honourable 21 city additional city civil & sessions court Bangalore in it's order dated 24.01.1992 
   discharged        03  charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution
failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as
they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the
charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has
given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the
involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.
 
Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into
service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry & showed
contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of
Karnataka ordered RBI to review it's order with respect to
mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service
, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.
 
In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all
, orders of court over rides the organisation's internal rules ,
service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical
manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the
scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had
personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI  repeatedly showed contempt to the
court orders , dismissed the scape goat - ailing old man mr.G.Hariram
from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss
to the bank , didn't pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and
finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man
has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot
& he is a mental wreck today.
 
Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /
scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn't conduct polygraph tests
of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers
of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the
crimes master minded by higher ups & didn't co-operate with the higher
ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape
goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating
innocents themselves as criminals.
 
Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram & who
will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?
 
 
PUBLIC CROSS EXAMINATION OF  HONOURABLE GOVERNOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO  old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991   AT 21 ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE 
 
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
 
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
 
Amended charge sheet  staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985
 
 
 
1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of  1979 ?
 
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?
 
3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?
 
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of
value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
 
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
 
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?
 
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
 
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?
 
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
 
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?
 
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead  of
independent investigation ?
 
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
 
13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations
for preserving old documents / records ?
 
14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it  didn't , why ?
 
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
 
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?
 
17. RBI authorities have stated  that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However  RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
 
18. The alleged crime  was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
 
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
 
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
 
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?
 
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
 
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?
 
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
 
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why  RBI has denied his
pension ?
 
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
 
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
 
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000
to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI  completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
 
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
 
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
 
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
 
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
 
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
 
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?
 
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
 
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled verified defective note packets ?
 
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers illegal ?
 
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went missing ?
 
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
 
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from packets made into new bundles , right ?
 
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers are there , who didn’t work at all on that day is not it ?
 
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
 
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?
 
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
 
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
 
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 & 1979 ?
 
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court proceedings ?
 
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is not 100% sure ?
 
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn’t it ?
 
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn’t notice3 any fraud. However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been taken ?
 
51. why you didn’t produce all records of all persons , who have specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?
 
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
 
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn’t it ?
 
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
 
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original criminals ?
 
56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?
 
57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?
 
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you didn’t even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal prosecution ?
 
59. Is it RBI’s & CBI’s way of fair play & justice ?
 
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn’t it ?
 
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
 
 
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
 
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted , dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
 
64. you don’t have any internal statuotary records to prove that mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer’s office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?
 
65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
 
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
 
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off why ?
 
68.        the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
 
 
 

69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work practices ?

70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original criminals ?

questions with respect to other cases

71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have invested ?

73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?

74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann’t be realized in the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than permissible ?

75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.

76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before investing in new companies promoted by them.

77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?

80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

81. what action has been taken against those involved ?

82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful & bigwigs ?

83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign donations by many NGOs ?

85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?

questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE

86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?


87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what criminal roles ?


88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?


89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the security set-up in R.B.I ?


90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?


91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are accounted for?


92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?


93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all the above?


94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?


95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?

96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?

99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?

100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of cubboard ?

101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not why ?

102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?

103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?

FINANCE SCAMS IN INDIA & 5-STAR LEADERS WITH BEGGING BOWL

In ” mysooru mithra” a kannada daily dated 15/06/2005, the editor has written about a copy of the complaint made by Transparency International India-Bangalore to central vigilance commission of india.


In indian banks , there is a strange practice that whenever a cheque is put before the clearing house by a bank, the clearing house sends that cheque to the service branch of bank paying. The service branch then sends that cheque to the appropriate bank branch
for deduction of cash from the cheque account. In this travel , if the cheque is lost or misplaced midway, the service branch pays out of it’s suspense account to the cash collecting bank. Logically, afterwards the service branch must initiate a thorough inquiry, get authentication from both persons one who gave cheque & other who collected cheque. Finally, the money must be transferred from the account of cheque giver to the suspense account.


However , upto 1997 two branches of state bank of india in bangalore & overseas branch sufferred from frequent loss of cheques totally amounting to RUPEES THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED CRORE. In all cases of cheque loss the bank has paid out of suspense account, totally amounting to Rs.3200 crore. However the bank has not
initiated any enquiry to recover that amount from the cheque givers.


In the 1997 internal audit report of the bank itself , this has been clearly pointed out. Till date, even the central vigilance commission has not initiated any action about it. A member of central vigilance commission happens to be ex-chairman of state bank of india.


It is just an instance of two branches of SBI, what about hundreds of branches of SBI, what about thousands of branches of other public sector,private sector & co-operative banks. It is fraud,fraud,fraud all the way. Few months back to cover-up the crimes
of global trust bank ( GTB) , it was taken over by oriental bank of commerce ( OBC).
While sanctioning a loan of just Rs.10000 to a common man , he has to comply with lengthy legalities. If he defaults, bankers breath down his neck, bankers send rowdies in the form of recovery agents to humiliate the common man & his properties are
auctioned-off, finally all dues to the last penny are recovered. In most of the cases bankers even force the defaulters to commit suicide. However influential persons easily gets loans amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees, coolly defaults, siphons-off the funds & shuts his shop. No recovery at all , just it becomes a non- performing asset (NPA) in the bank ledger. The total NPAs of all public sector banks is more than Rs.80000 crore. This burden is spead over the crores of hapless indians.


The government takes pride in murdering forest brigand veerappan. The ill-gotten wealth of veerappan is not even pea nuts before this huge amount. Remember past finance scams – MS SHOES, HAWALA, HARSHAD MEHTA SHARE SCAM, KETAN PAREKH SHARE SCAM, UTI, etc. totally in all these scams billions of dollars of public money have gone to the coffers of criminals. These scamsters put veerappan to shame in their turnover. However the government is not even exhibiting a fraction of it’s ELIMINATE VEERAPPAN DRIVE against these scamsters, why?


In india, both central & state government tax/ revenue officials are neck deep in corruption. By, taking bribe they make lower assessment of income, gains, etc & spare businessmen from the tax payment. The government in return for favours received from
lobbies, gives tax exemptions to them at it’s sweet will. All these scams & it’s cover-ups are insider jobs. The government is not interested to collect, recover it’s own monies
amounting to billions of billions of dollars every year. However our 5-star leaders living at the expense of tax-payers, go-on foreign jaunts with a begging bowl for a few lakhs of dollars. What a shame?


More than 50 billion indians are barely surviving on a single meal per day & hundreds are dying due to starvation, billions don’t even have basic necessities of life. If the government even just collects a fraction of it’s dues from scamsters, defaulting industrialists – people won’t die of hunger in india. Has this enlightened our thick skinned netas ?

AN APPEAL TO Mr.P.CHIDAMBARAM UNION FINANCE MINISTER GOVERNMENT OF
INDIA

An age old saying – AS THE KING SO DOES THE SUBJECTS. In india various financial scams, crimes & it’s cover-ups have taken place amounting to billions of billions of dollars have taken place, made possible , just due to the involvement of the king – the netas & government officials themselves in the shameful act – the crime.


The tax officials are utterly corrupt, the wards of these officials spend double their pappa’s salary just during
weekends. Now, realise their financial might. These ill-gotten wealth is destabilising our economy & might have even found it’s way into the hands of underworld, terorrists. INDIA WILL BE DEFEATED FROM
CRIMINAL FORCES WITHIN LIKE THIS NOT FROM THE EXTERNAL FORCES.


Hereby, the HRW urges you to make public:


1. the financial worth of finance minister to tax official at circle level, on annual basis including his spouse’s worth & property details.


2. to make public the NPAs, losses & monies under litigation by both private & public sector banks annually.


3. to make public measures taken to recover these monies.


4. to publish annual accounts with complete details of discretionary funds allotted to the defence ministry, president, prime minister, chief ministers , governors & intelligence agencies.


Public want to know whether proper discretion is being applied while spending.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE –  570017 INDIA …       cell :09341820313
home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ ,
http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ , http://hrwpaper.blogspot.com/ ,  http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
contact :
naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA

theft in RBI

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH – Weekly newspaper on web
Spreading The Light Of Humanity & Freedom

Editor : NAGARAJ.M.R. VOL.1 ISSUE . 31
09/10/2005

EDITORIAL : FAILURES OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA
– AN APPEAL TO H.E. GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA

The honourable karnataka lokayukta has failed to
take action in the following cases, which were brought before him by
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH seeking justice , in may 2005. In most of the
cases, karnataka lokayukta has even failed to reply.

Case.no.1 : secretaries of district legal aid board, mysore &
karnataka legal aid services, are not giving legal aid to HRW inspite
of repeated appeals. No reply from lokayukta.

Case no.2 : director-general of police for karnataka, is not
registering my complaints against VVIPs on charges of human rights &
fundamental rights violations. Also, he is not registering the
complaint against MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S RPG CABLES LTD, MYSORE , for
causing occupational health damages to workers & on charges of
fundamental & human rights violations. No reply from lokayukta.

Case no.3 : the chief inspector of factories for karnataka & labour
commissioner for karnataka , have failed to enforce occupational
safeguards in M/S RPG CABLES LTD, MYSORE, which has resulted in
health damages to workers. Both of them are not even registering
HRW’s plea for compensation to the workers who are sufferring from
occupational health damages. To escape from their responsibility of
enforcing occupational safety, they are clubbing this issue with
illegal retrenchment which is under adjudication. In the reference
made to the adjudicating body by the government of karnataka, only
there is reference of retrenchment issue only. so, both the labour
commissioner & chief inspector of factories are misleading the
justice seekers & helping the criminals. No reply from lokayukta.

Case no.4 : the illegalities in recruitment at PES COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING, mandya ( no: PES/EST/APT/1996-97:704). No reply from
lokayukta.

Case no.5 : illegalities in APPOINTMENT ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS at
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING MYSORE . no reply from lokayukta.

Case no.6 : negligence of duty by the karnataka lokayukta with
respect to cases filed by HRW, complaint filed against karnataka
lokayukta himself. No reply from lokayukta.

Case no.7 : illegalities committed by the commissioner, bangalore
development authority , harrassing , tormenting a poor woman.
Karnataka lokayukta sought an affidavit from the complainant ( letter
no: comp/misc/bcd/449/05). The complainant has submitted the said
affidavit on 20/07/2005. No reply from lokayukta till date.

Case no.8 : recruitment illegalities committed by registrar, city
civil court, bangalore ( NO: ADM/E(A)/422/2003) & registrar, district
& sessions court, mysore ( NO: ADMN/A/10825/2003). Karnataka
lokayukta has closed the case saying that both the registrars are not
karnataka government employees, so not under his jurisdiction in his
letter no: COMP/MISC/BCD/480/2005.
If both court registrars are not karnataka
government employees, how they are eligible to be members of
KARNATAKA STATE GOVERNMENT JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY ? then how can supreme court judges & high court judges are
allotted prime residential land at judicial layout , yelahanka,
bangalore, by this society at dirt cheap rates ? why not the
government of karnataka has not confiscated lands allotted illegally
to judicial officers ? no reply from lokayukta.
Hereby, HRW urges H.E. GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA to
look into this matter & to provide justice to the all concerned in
the above mentioned cases at the earliest. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

09/10/2005

Your’s sincerely,
mysore

nagaraj.m.r.

CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A) AGAINST A POOR
WOWAN

The B.D.A flouts it’s own rules & spreads red carpet
for big land developers & land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge
money spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work
hand in glove with criminal elements & rowdies. They illegally evict
genuine allottees who are poor & without any connections from
allotted prime lands & sell-off those prime land to the highest
bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward
areas & in some cases left in the lurch.
Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D.
chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted
with house no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in
1978 vode letter no. 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale
basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah complied with all
the rules & in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house
cost in B.D.A’S account. However when he went over to his allotted
house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were
already residing there. He complained about this matter to the legal
owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn’t take steps
to evict the illegal encroachers nor did they make any complaint to
the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc
fell on deaf ears. Hurt by this gross injustice & mounting financial
burdens the poor old man died.
Subsequently, the poor man’s daughter smt.
Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A
authorities once again , to evict illegal encroachers from her
father’s allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played
a different game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral
instructions to live in that vacant house & told her that they will
regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans &
repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before she was to occupy
that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy
elements in that house. Once again the poor woman was cheated. She
lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.
Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these
gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take
thousands of rupees salary & perks every month, all at the expense of
tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice. Thereby, they
are violating the poor woman’s fundamental & human rights.
Hereby, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH urges H.E GOVERNOR OF
KARNATAKA , the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable
lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable chairman national human rights
commission , honourable chairman national commission for women &
honourable chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the
appropriate action & to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE FOR KARNATAKA

Dear D.G.P sir,
Now you are defending your actions against
naxals,the fake encounter against them in
chickmangalore,karnataka.you are not looking at the most basic issues
there,the loss of their traditional livlihood of the aborigins,the
mass displacement of natives due to government projects,improper &
insufficient rehabilitation measures.the police & forest officials
arrests , charges a aborigin for illegally tresspassing into the
reserve forests, if he is just there in the forests to take
dried,fallen woods, medicinal plants.it is their livlihood since
centuries to the aborigins or girijans.whereas you don’t charge the
rich plantation owners even if they usurp govrnment lands/reserve
forest lands and cultivate it ,grow rich cash crops in it.
PARADOXICALLY INSTEAD OF PUNISHING THOSE
GUILTY , THE GOVERNMENT LEVIES A PITTANCE AS FINE & REGULARISES
LEGALISES THEIR CRIME OF ILLEGAL POSSESSION OF RESERVE FOREST LANDS.
Have you ensured corruption free
administration there?have you ensured that the government funds has
reached the target people?NO.for example go through the following
complaint . you are not even registering the complaint against the
rich & mighty.all your dare devilry is against poor people only.when
poor people rises their voice for justice they are silenced through
charging them with fake charges or third degree torture or lockup
death.veerappan was alleged to have been killed in fake encounter,
his brother died under doubtful conditions in police custody.till
date you have not charged the bigwigs who benefitted from
veerappan ,who traded with veerappan ?
Naxal movement is a making of the corrupt
government,HOWEVER THE PATH OF VIOLENCE CHOOSEN BY THEM IS NOT AT ALL
RIGHT OR HUMANE .ofcourse some of their objectives are
good,humane.violence breeds violence,it won’t bring peace or
prosperity.DEMOCRACY WITH FULL ACCOUNTABILITY OF ALL is a most good
form of governance.

I have conducted a press meet on 10/12/04 at
PATRAKARTHARA BHAVANA mysore ,to state various human rights
violations by constitutional functionaries (V.V.I.Ps).at the press
meet itself i have released a copy of the complaint addressed to the
honourable D.G.P OF KARNATAKA.on 10/12/04 i have sent the said
complaint along with the press statement to you through registered
post (ack.due).
Till date you have not replied,why? your delay
in registering my complaint amounts to following violations/crimes
committed by you.
1.violation of my fundamental & human rights.
2.covering-up crime.
3.supporting criminals & their crimes.
4.failure of your constitutional duties as a police officer.
5.violation of your oath of office.
6.public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.
Hereby, i do once again request you to register
my complaint & to give me justice, at the earliest.thank you.
HAVE A NICEDAY.

09/10/05

your’s sincerely,
mysore

nagaraj.m.r.

R.B.I CURRENCY THEFT CASE – COVER-UP ACT BY C.B.I?
– AN APPEAL TO THE UNION FINANCE MINISTER & CENTRAL VIGILANCE
COMMISSION

Even in ordinary branches of banks , the safety
locker room keys & currency chest room keys are with senior managers
only. with advance of technology various electronic gadgets like
burglar alarms, user id & palm readers are in use. It is quite
shocking to know that , in high security RBI CURRENCY PRESS , mysore
these gadgets were not in use & the keys were easily accessible to
ordinary security guards. Also, in mysore press there is no proper
accounting practices for blank papers issued for printing , after
printing is done accounts of accepted notes & rejected notes is not
at all kept. CBI is putting the whole blame on an ordinary security
guards & hurrying to close the case. The repeated thefts are not at
all possible by security guards alone without the help of insiders /
higher executives. CBI is trying to fool whom?

Even with respect to my complaint regarding
recruitment scandal complaint no: DPG/B/2005/80049 (2) (RBI) new
complaint no: DPG/Z/2005/90040, neither CBI nor secretary ( finance
sector ) department of economic affairs government of india nor the
RBI governor has taken any steps till date , why?
Hereby, HRW urges the honourable union finance
minister & CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION to look into the matter & to
provide speedy justice to all concerned.

C.B.I COVERING UP THEFTS IN R.B.I
Lie detector tests for C.B.I officers ?

Nowadays even free e-mail accounts need password to operate, to
operate a bank locker there are multi level security settings.
However , it is ridiculous, unbelievable to note that in the high
security reserve bank of india currency note press mysore, there were
no different key sets , palm readers, pass words, no different
authorised persons, no troops of security guards, to access the area.
Just only one security guard- a constable.
It is a cock & bull story of C.B.I, that all alone a single security
guard stole the booty. There must be a crime syndicate. The C.B.I
officers themselves must be subjected to polygraph, brain mapping
tests to know why they are lying , to cover-up whom? The C.B.I has
not answered previous questions raised by HRW. The C.B.I must answer
the following questions :
1. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at
security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
2. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for
what criminal roles ?
3. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
4. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the
security set-up in R.B.I ?
5. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
6. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process
are accounted for?
7. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
8. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all
the above?
9. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
10. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?

ILLEGAL RECRUITMENT IN R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS RESULTING IN
FREQUENT THEFTS ???

Dear sir,
I have applied for the post of STORES ASSISTANT in
1995 & for the post of PROCESS ASSISTANT in 1996 for vaccancies at
Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Private Limited ( BRBNMPL) MYSORE
& SALBONI. I didn’t even get the interview/written test call letter.
However candidates with lesser merit ranking were selected. My
requests for a copy of merit ranking list fell on deaf ears.
In the end of 1996, i once again applied for the
posts
of PROCESS ASSISTANT & MAINTANANCE ASSISTANT at BRBNMPL. This time
round i got written test call letters for both posts. I have
successfully cleared the common written test for both posts.
Subsequently i got the interview call letters for both posts. I have
successfully appeared for the common interview for both posts.
However candidates of lesser merit were selected & i didn’t get any
communication at all. My repeated requests for MERIT RANKING LIST
fell on deaf ears.
It is the criminals in R.B.I MANAGEMENT who
declared a good printing machine at nasik security press as scrap &
sold it to fake stamp paper king pin karim lala telgi It may be
possible that the criminals in the R.B.I MANAGEMENT selected
candidates who suited their criminal objectives. As a result there is
frequent occurrence of currency thefts & related
irregularities at R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS, mysore & salboni.
Hereby, i call upon the C.B.I to look into this matter.
Also, hereby i urge you to provide me justice by giving merit ranking
lists of all recruitments made from 1995onwards till date.
Specifically, for the above mentioned 4 posts in accordance with the
TRANSPARENCY /RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT of government of india.

AN APPEAL TO H.E. GOVERNOR OF WEST BENGAL INDIA

YOUR EXCELLENCY,

INDIA: Victim of rape and attempted murder held in jail for two years
while the perpetrators remain at large
Name of the victims:
1. Joyeeta Bala Das
2. Her husband (deceased)
3. Her eldest daughter (deceased)
4. Her four-year-old daughter (currently in jail with her mother)
All of Bena village, under the Basirhat police station, 24 Parganas
(North) District, West Bengal, India
Name of the alleged perpetrators:
1. Puneet Kumar (Assistant Commandant)
2. Gaya Prasad (Head Constable)
3. G. Birbhan Singh (Head Constable)
4. Kana Singh (Head Constable)
5. Hanuman Thapa (Constable)
All of the Border Security Force at 122 Battalion Outpost under the
jurisdiction of the Basirhat police station, 24 Parganas (North)
District, West Bengal, India
Place of incident: 122 Battalion, Assistant Commandant’s room
Date of incident: January 2003
I write to voice my anger and disgust regarding the gang rape of a
woman, the attempted murder of her and one of her daughters, the
murder of her husband and other daughter and the complete break-down
of the rule of law that has seen the victim and her surviving
daughter placed in jail for the past two years.
According to the information I have received, Joyeeta Bala Das and
her family were taken captive in January 2003 by Border Security
Forces (BSF) near the India/Bangladesh border. After gang raping
Joyeeta Bala Das, the BSF then forced her and her family onto a
damaged boat, which upon sinking led to the death of Joyeeta Bala
Das’s husband and eldest daughter. Joyeeta Bala Das and her youngest
daughter survived and then attempted to seek justice for their
perpetrators crimes. However, BSF authorities have continued to
maintain that the actions of BSF personnel are an entirely internal
matter and therefore they cannot be charged by the police or taken
before a court of law. When Joyeeta Bala Das attempted to do so, it
was she who was sent to jail, supposedly for `safe custody’, while
the perpetrators were allowed to remain free.
Joyeeta Bala Das and her four-year-old daughter have now served two
and a half years in the Presidency Jail and therefore it is only they
who are being punished for the BSF personnel’s crimes. That a victim
of gang rape and attempted murder who has also lost her husband and
daughter can be jailed while the perpetrators remain at large, is a
situation that is entirely incomprehensible. That a four-year-old
girl could also be imprisoned for this same amount of time, only adds
to the tragedy of this case.
I trust that you will share in my anger at not only the crimes
committed in this case, but in the appalling manner in which they
have been dealt. While this woman has had to deal with the trauma of
rape and the heartache of losing her loved ones, those responsible
for this have been free to get on with their life. Such a situation
must not be ignored as this woman’s suffering has already gone on for
far too long.
I therefore call on you to use your full authority to help bring
justice to Joyeeta Bala Das and her family. Genuine and direct steps
must be taken immediately to have Joyeeta Bala Das and her daughter
removed from jail and their personal security ensured. A full and
thorough investigation should be conducted into this matter and
charges laid against persons found to have involvement in the alleged
crimes. If found guilty in court, such persons should be fully
punished according to law. The investigation should also look into
the claim that the Basirhat police never filed charges against the
perpetrators, and as to why proper legal representation was never
afforded to Joyeeta Bala Das.
Evident from this case is the complete collapse of rule of law within
the state of West Bengal.
Also apparent is the complete lack of competence and willingness to
assist by those authorities invested with the power to protect and
seek justice for Joyeeta Bala Das. That they can stand by and watch
an innocent woman and her child linger indefinitely in a jail while
their perpetrators enjoy freedom, says little for the respect for
human rights by those authorities within West Bengal.
I look to your immediate intervention in this matter.
Yours sincerely,
NAGARAJ.M.R.

EDITED,PRINTED & PUBLISHED BY NAGARAJ.M.R. @ EWS 190 HUDCO 3RD STAGE
HEBBAL MYSORE-570016 INDIA. Home page :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw e-mail : naghrw@yahoo.com
A member of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INDIA